ocr: surya should ask who serves the model, not where the GPU is (v0.3.7)
OCR on the Digesta install answered 503: "vLLM isolated venv not found at
/cache/vllm_venv". That host has no GPU at all — renting A40 pods is its whole
job — so the venv it was told to build could never have run, while the Surya-2
checkpoint it needed was already a configured model (backend: runpod,
engine: coderai-vllm) nothing in the OCR path could ask for.
The model layer was never the problem; `ocr.surya_serve` was asking the wrong
question. It enumerated server PROCESSES — torch in a local venv, our own vLLM,
a URL typed in by hand — when the answer the operator had already written down
was a MODEL. olmOCR has had that bridge since it shipped ("model" mode, through
our own chat path); Surya never got one, because Surya2 drives its server
directly with guided-JSON decoding and logprobs that a proxy hop would drop.
So it gets the same bridge, in the only shape it can take: resolve the model
through whichever backend owns it and hand the worker the address. Three values,
because Surya refuses a server whose /v1/models disagrees with the checkpoint it
expects, and a pod URL is useless without its token — which only Surya's vLLM
client reads, so a bearer-locked endpoint is always attached to as "vllm".
The address is a lease, not a location: a min_pods=0 pod is reaped when OCR goes
quiet, and the page that finds it gone re-resolves once — renting a fresh one —
instead of every later page failing against a dead URL. A failure against a
server that still answers /health is a real error and is reported as one.
Co-Authored-By:
Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PxYHWbCAjjjD7A1rhFKtaW
Showing
codai/ocr/served_model.py
0 → 100644
This diff is collapsed.
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment