Commit 5c57575c authored by Kyle J. McKay's avatar Kyle J. McKay Committed by Christian Beier

Support Mac OS X vnc client with no password

Support connections from the Mac OS X built-in VNC client to
LibVNCServers running with no password and advertising a server
version of 3.7 or greater.
parent 8121e844
......@@ -127,12 +127,37 @@ rfbVncAuthSendChallenge(rfbClientPtr cl)
* Send the NO AUTHENTICATION. SCARR
*/
/*
* The rfbVncAuthNone function is currently the only function that contains
* special logic for the built-in Mac OS X VNC client which is activated by
* a protocolMinorVersion == 889 coming from the Mac OS X VNC client.
* The rfbProcessClientInitMessage function does understand how to handle the
* RFB_INITIALISATION_SHARED state which was introduced to support the built-in
* Mac OS X VNC client, but rfbProcessClientInitMessage does not examine the
* protocolMinorVersion version field and so its support for the
* RFB_INITIALISATION_SHARED state is not restricted to just the OS X client.
*/
static void
rfbVncAuthNone(rfbClientPtr cl)
{
/* The built-in Mac OS X VNC client behaves in a non-conforming fashion
* when the server version is 3.7 or later AND the list of security types
* sent to the OS X client contains the 'None' authentication type AND
* the OS X client sends back the 'None' type as its choice. In this case,
* and this case ONLY, the built-in Mac OS X VNC client will NOT send the
* ClientInit message and instead will behave as though an implicit
* ClientInit message containing a shared-flag of true has been sent.
* The special state RFB_INITIALISATION_SHARED represents this case.
* The Mac OS X VNC client can be detected by checking protocolMinorVersion
* for a value of 889. No other VNC client is known to use this value
* for protocolMinorVersion. */
uint32_t authResult;
if (cl->protocolMajorVersion==3 && cl->protocolMinorVersion > 7) {
/* The built-in Mac OS X VNC client expects to NOT receive a SecurityResult
* message for authentication type 'None'. Since its protocolMinorVersion
* is greater than 7 (it is 889) this case must be tested for specially. */
if (cl->protocolMajorVersion==3 && cl->protocolMinorVersion > 7 && cl->protocolMinorVersion != 889) {
rfbLog("rfbProcessClientSecurityType: returning securityResult for client rfb version >= 3.8\n");
authResult = Swap32IfLE(rfbVncAuthOK);
if (rfbWriteExact(cl, (char *)&authResult, 4) < 0) {
......@@ -141,7 +166,12 @@ rfbVncAuthNone(rfbClientPtr cl)
return;
}
}
cl->state = RFB_INITIALISATION;
cl->state = cl->protocolMinorVersion == 889 ? RFB_INITIALISATION_SHARED : RFB_INITIALISATION;
if (cl->state == RFB_INITIALISATION_SHARED)
/* In this case we must call rfbProcessClientMessage now because
* otherwise we would hang waiting for data to be received from the
* client (the ClientInit message which will never come). */
rfbProcessClientMessage(cl);
return;
}
......
......@@ -593,6 +593,7 @@ rfbProcessClientMessage(rfbClientPtr cl)
rfbAuthProcessClientMessage(cl);
return;
case RFB_INITIALISATION:
case RFB_INITIALISATION_SHARED:
rfbProcessClientInitMessage(cl);
return;
default:
......@@ -720,6 +721,14 @@ rfbProcessClientInitMessage(rfbClientPtr cl)
rfbClientPtr otherCl;
rfbExtensionData* extension;
if (cl->state == RFB_INITIALISATION_SHARED) {
/* In this case behave as though an implicit ClientInit message has
* already been received with a shared-flag of true. */
ci.shared = 1;
/* Avoid the possibility of exposing the RFB_INITIALISATION_SHARED
* state to calling software. */
cl->state = RFB_INITIALISATION;
} else {
if ((n = rfbReadExact(cl, (char *)&ci,sz_rfbClientInitMsg)) <= 0) {
if (n == 0)
rfbLog("rfbProcessClientInitMessage: client gone\n");
......@@ -728,6 +737,7 @@ rfbProcessClientInitMessage(rfbClientPtr cl)
rfbCloseClient(cl);
return;
}
}
memset(u.buf,0,sizeof(u.buf));
......
......@@ -456,13 +456,44 @@ typedef struct _rfbClientRec {
#ifdef LIBVNCSERVER_HAVE_LIBPTHREAD
pthread_t client_thread;
#endif
/* Note that the RFB_INITIALISATION_SHARED state is provided to support
clients that under some circumstances do not send a ClientInit message.
In particular the Mac OS X built-in VNC client (with protocolMinorVersion
== 889) is one of those. However, it only requires this support under
special circumstances that can only be determined during the initial
authentication. If the right conditions are met this state will be
set (see the auth.c file) when rfbProcessClientInitMessage is called.
If the state is RFB_INITIALISATION_SHARED we should not expect to recieve
any ClientInit message, but instead should proceed to the next stage
of initialisation as though an implicit ClientInit message was received
with a shared-flag of true. (There is currently no corresponding
RFB_INITIALISATION_NOTSHARED state to represent an implicit ClientInit
message with a shared-flag of false because no known existing client
requires such support at this time.)
Note that software using LibVNCServer to provide a VNC server will only
ever have a chance to see the state field set to
RFB_INITIALISATION_SHARED if the software is multi-threaded and manages
to examine the state field during the extremely brief window after the
'None' authentication type selection has been received from the built-in
OS X VNC client and before the rfbProcessClientInitMessage function is
called -- control cannot return to the caller during this brief window
while the state field is set to RFB_INITIALISATION_SHARED. */
/** Possible client states: */
enum {
RFB_PROTOCOL_VERSION, /**< establishing protocol version */
RFB_SECURITY_TYPE, /**< negotiating security (RFB v.3.7) */
RFB_AUTHENTICATION, /**< authenticating */
RFB_INITIALISATION, /**< sending initialisation messages */
RFB_NORMAL /**< normal protocol messages */
RFB_NORMAL, /**< normal protocol messages */
/* Ephemeral internal-use states that will never be seen by software
* using LibVNCServer to provide services: */
RFB_INITIALISATION_SHARED /**< sending initialisation messages with implicit shared-flag already true */
} state;
rfbBool reverseConnection;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment